Power admission

Power isn't really power unless it resolves needs. Otherwise it's just coercive force.

Power admissions

impact parity model - structural exaction - conventional opposition locks us i imbalance

 Admitting we tend to generalize too much.

RK: The less you personally know someone, the more you rely on the impersonal norms of written and unwritten laws. The more others rely on laws to respect your specific needs, the less they get to know you and your specific needs, sometimes with dire consequences.  

 Admitting we tend to generalize too much.

RK: The less you personally know someone, the more you rely on the impersonal norms of written and unwritten laws. The more others rely on laws to respect your specific needs, the less they get to know you and your specific needs, sometimes with dire consequences.  

The less you personally know someone, the more you rely on the impersonal norms of written and unwritten laws. The more others rely on laws to respect your specific needs, the less they get to know you and your specific needs, sometimes with dire consequences.  

 Admitting we tend to generalize too much.

 Admitting we tend to generalize too much.

 Admitting we tend to generalize too much.

You don't know what you don't know

Your unknown unknowns, our silenced pain

structural exaction

Impact Parity Model

impactee

impactor 

Which do you think is more feasible?

All needs sit equal before nature. 

Nature refuses to submit to our psychosocial reduction ideologies. Nature will compel you to focus on your pain from unmet needs. Nature could care less about our popular ideas of reasoning. Needs come first, reasons later. 

Nature trumps our rugged individualism. Indulge your desires at the expense of others you value, and nature will pain you with guilt. 

Nature trumps our conformity to social norms. Neglect your needs for others and nature will pain you with redirecting depression. 

resolving specific needs on all sides to remove pain that seeks generalizations for relief, stopping this vicious cycle

resolving specific needs on all sides to remove pain that seeks generalizations for relief, stopping this vicious cycle

AI

IMPACTOR = You impact the relationship more than you are impacted by it.

Ascribed

Impactor

RI

IMPACTEE = You are impacted by the relationship more than you impact it.

Reporting

Impactee

reporting without presuming one is factually impacted as expressed

ascribed to leave open possibility of error

upchain: 

downchain: 

crosschain: 

Generalize lawbreakers as bad and any victims as the state's interest

applied anankelogy

As Gandhi reportedly declared, "I will not pay a hundred rupees" and instead will risk sitting in jail at the government's expense. I did so before and, like Chelsea Manning, I can do it again.

with its own unique vocabulary, bringing to light the nuance affecting your needs

anankelogy

YOU GENERALIZE

"Opposing what another needs does not extinguish moral conflict, but enflames it."

"Authority without need-resolving legitimacy slips easily into tyranny."

"Nature is the true power, creating the power of needs. "

"Violence is weakness turned outward. Resilience is strength turned inward."

solving problems by resolving needs
Inviting donations
  • VR Facebook page
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • YouTube Social  Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon

Enter your own amount.