Anankelogy 101

10 Wisdom

Anankelogy based wisdom

Anankelogic wisdom

 

Nature-based anankelogy, the study of need.

Which do you think is more likely?

 

Apart from written laws, you have a right to believe and do as your conscious dictates, because all beliefs about moral conduct are culturally relative.

 

OR

 

There are universal principles equally applicable to all members of humanity, and failure to live by them equally result in problems.

 

Nature-based anankelogy recognizes needs as objective phenomenon. Core needs exist as universal phenomenon. How we experience our core needs includes some variance. How we ease these core needs drifts into realms of relativity. But let’s not jump to extremes by declaring it all relative (since “all” is itself an absolute).

 

Each of these listed anankelogy principles speak to maintaining or restoring function, or avoiding defunction. Function provides the anchor for universality.

Pronunciation guide

anankelogy [n.] (ä'-nä-kĕ'-lŏ-jē): the study of need, specifically here the human experience of need.

anankelogical [adj.] (ä'-nä-kĕ-lŏ'-jĭ'-kâl): of, relating to, or characteristic of anankelogy; referring to the role of need in another subject.

anankelogist [n.] (ä'-nä-kĕ'-lŏ-jĭst): one who studies the role of need in observable phenomenon.

anankelogically [adv.] (ä'-nä-kĕ-lŏ'-jĭ-kâ-lē'): referring to the role of need on some action. E.g., Political views tend to be less rationally deduced and more anankelogically produced. 

anakelogic [adj.] (ä'-nä-kĕ-lŏ'-jĭk): same as anankelogical.

Anankelogic Love Maxims

L1. Maxim

L2. Maxim

L3. Maxim

Anankelogic Adages

The 3rd group 

A. Adage

B. Adage

C. Adage

D. Adage

E. Adage

F. Adage

G. Adage

H. Adage

.I. Adage

J. Adage

K. Adage

L. Adage

M. Adage

N. Adage

O. Adage

P. Adage

Q. Adage

R. Adage

S. Adage

T. Adage

U. Adage

V. Adage

W. Adage

X. Adage

Y. Adage

Z. Adage

AA. Adage

Anankelogic Personalized Sayings

P1. saying

P2. saying

P3. saying

 

Anankelogic Rhyming Aphorisms

The 5th group 

A) Rhymer

B) Rhymer

C) Rhymer

D) Rhymer

E) Rhymer

F) Rhymer

G) Rhymer

H) Rhymer

.I) Rhymer

J) Rhymer

K) Rhymer

L) Rhymer

M) Rhymer

N) Rhymer

O) Rhymer

P) Rhymer

Q) Rhymer

R) Rhymer

S) Rhymer

T) Rhymer

U) Rhymer

V) Rhymer

W) Rhymer

X) Rhymer

Y) Rhymer

Z) Rhymer

AA) Rhymer

Anankelogic love maxims

 

Segment description

1.  There’s no greater authority than resolving needs with love.

 

Principle summarized 

 
Need experience

Illustrative examples

Impacts

2.  There is no greater revolution than to revolve back to love.

Principle summarized

 
Need experience

Illustrative examples

Impacts

3.  Your safest generalization is to love.

 

Principle summarized 

 
Need experience

Illustrative examples

Impacts

Anankelogic adages

Anankelogic adages

 

Segment description

 
A.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
B.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
C.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
D.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
E.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
F.
We cannot solve our specific problems from the level of generalizing that created them.

Generalizing is convenient. Generalizing helps build coalitions. Generalizing offers relief. If stuck generalizing, the attention to the nuance shaping our specific needs gets easily overlooked.

 

You almost always start your understanding of something from a generalized view. To address the needs involved, generalizations must serve as stepping stones to relevant specifics. Otherwise your generalizing easily hardens into a stumbling block.

 

Unpack a problem and you will likely find specific needs overlooked. That goes for politics too. Politics make for better windows than doors. You can peer in with your generalizations. You cannot enter without transitioning to relevant specifics. Generalizing rarely solves problems on their own. In fact, too much generalizing can perpetuate problems in the name of addressing them.

 

Relief-generalizing offers a tempting substitute to the discipline of fully resolving needs. When it fails, we tend to blame others. We slide into fights, into reactive vacillation, into contra-opposition and reflexive reinforcement. And even into conflict porn. We become glued to the false promises of generalizations, and grow addicted to its avoidance of uncomfortable specifics.

 

Unfortunately, this generalization dependency permeates modern societies. Symfunctionality abounds, collapsing into dysfunction and then misfunction. We tolerate mass institutions like politics and the judiciary to traffic in divisive generalizations, then wonder why problems persist.

 

Love, grace and similar refunctions take proactive steps to “degeneralize” or to step back from attachments to generalizations. We solve our problems by resolving the specific needs behind each problem. The more we can detach from provisional generalizations, the more fully we can solve our many problems.

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
G.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
H.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
I.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
J.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
K.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
L.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
M.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
N.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
O.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
P.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
Q.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
R.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
S.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t

101-06.00
 
T.
Adage

Principle summarized

Engaging contra: What if this is not valid?

t